Abhishek Singhvi Urges EC to Prevent Release of ‘Divisive’ Film on 2020 Delhi Riots 2025

Introduction

Abhishek Singhvi Senior Congress leader and prominent lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi has called upon the Election Commission (EC) to prevent the release of a controversial film reportedly based on the 2020 Delhi riots. Singhvi has argued that the movie, which portrays the events of the riots, Abhishek Singhvi could be highly divisive and detrimental to communal harmony, especially with the upcoming elections in view. His appeal comes amid rising concerns about the potential misuse of artistic media to stoke tensions and polarize communities for political gain.

This appeal has sparked a heated debate about freedom of expression versus the potential for provocative content to disrupt societal peace and influence electoral outcomes. In this article, we analyze the background of the controversy, Singhvi’s statements, the potential implications of the movie’s release, Abhishek Singhvi and the broader concerns about political and social polarization in the country.

Abhishek Singhvi’s Appeal to the Election Commission

The Case Against the Film

Singhvi’s intervention comes in the form of an official request to the EC, Abhishek Singhvi urging the body to halt the release of the movie, particularly given its timing in relation to elections in several Indian states. Singhvi alleges that the film’s content is “communal in nature” and has the potential to disturb public order. He stated that releasing the film during this politically sensitive time could have serious repercussions for India’s secular fabric.

Speaking on the issue, Singhvi remarked, “The purpose of such a movie is not artistic but divisive. Under the guise of cinematic freedom, attempts are being made to sensationalize the tragedy of the 2020 Delhi riots and deepen the divides in our society. The Election Commission, as the guardian of free and fair elections, must step in to prevent the release of such politically charged content.”

Grounds for Singhvi’s Request

The Congress leader has based his request on the following premises:

1. Potential to Disturb Peace: Singhvi argued that the movie could stoke communal tensions by depicting the 2020 Delhi riots in a manner that incites hatred and polarizes communities.
2. Electoral Influence: The timing of the release, coinciding with elections in key states, raises concerns about its potential to influence voter sentiment and divert attention from real issues.
3. Violation of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC): Singhvi alleged that the release of such films during election periods undermines the neutrality mandated by the MCC, Abhishek Singhvi which seeks to ensure that divisive narratives do not affect electoral processes.

Singhvi emphasized that communal harmony must take precedence over any form of entertainment, urging all regulatory bodies to take responsibility for preserving social unity.

The 2020 Delhi Riots: A Brief Recap

The 2020 Delhi riots represent one of the most violent episodes of communal unrest in recent Indian history. The violence erupted in northeast Delhi in February 2020, Abhishek Singhvi claiming over 50 lives and leaving hundreds injured. Clashes began as tensions escalated between supporters and opponents of the contentious Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The violence quickly spiraled into full-blown communal riots, with allegations of incitement against political leaders on both sides.

Impact on Communities

The riots caused widespread loss of life and property, affecting both Hindu and Muslim communities. Shops, homes, and schools were burned, leaving survivors grappling with trauma and displacement. A judicial investigation into the riots revealed deep-rooted societal fault lines and criticized the role of inflammatory rhetoric in inciting violence.

Given the sensitive nature of the riots and their lasting impact on victims and communities, any attempt to depict them on screen risks reopening old wounds and intensifying existing divisions.

The Role of Cinema in Shaping Public Opinion

Films hold immense power to shape public narratives and influence societal perceptions, Abhishek Singhvi especially when they address contentious or historical events. In recent years, there has been an increase in movies and documentaries exploring divisive issues, from political conflicts to communal violence. While these films contribute to the broader discourse, they also come with the risk of amplifying sensitive issues.

Provocation or Art?

The release of films based on real-life communal events often leads to controversy, as filmmakers balance creative freedom with social responsibility. Proponents of such movies argue that they bring hidden stories to the forefront and challenge dominant narratives, while critics argue that they sensationalize tragedies, Abhishek Singhvi deepen divides, and glorify one-sided perspectives.

The timing of such films is often scrutinized. When movies with a strong political or religious undertone coincide with elections or periods of social unrest, Abhishek Singhvi questions arise about their intent. Singhvi has voiced similar concerns about the film on the 2020 Delhi riots, pointing out that it could be used as a political tool to inflame public emotions and polarize voters.

The Legal and Ethical Debate Around Censorship

Singhvi’s plea to the EC to block the movie’s release has reignited the debate on censorship and artistic freedom in India. On the one hand, the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a). On the other hand, reasonable restrictions can be imposed under Article 19(2) to preserve public order and prevent incitement of violence.

Censorship in Election Season

The Election Commission has been given the authority to ensure free and fair elections, free from divisive propaganda or undue influence. In the past, the EC has stepped in to halt the release of movies or documentaries perceived to have the potential to sway voter sentiment.

For instance, the release of a biopic on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Abhishek Singhvi titled PM Narendra Modi, was halted by the EC during the 2019 general elections, as it was seen as a potential tool for electoral propaganda. Singhvi’s appeal draws parallels to this case, calling for similar scrutiny of the proposed film on the Delhi riots.                                                    For the more information click on this link

Balancing Freedom and Responsibility

The controversy raises critical questions about where the line should be drawn between freedom of artistic expression and social responsibility. While a democratic society must allow artists to depict events honestly and critically, it must also ensure that such depictions do not incite hatred or glorify violence.

In this case, Singhvi and other critics argue that the movie’s intent is not to spark meaningful dialogue or reflection but to exploit communal tensions for political purposes, Abhishek Singhvi particularly in the lead-up to elections.

Political Implications of the Film’s Release

Polarization as a Political Tool

The release of films with communal overtones often feeds into a broader narrative of polarization that has characterized recent Indian politics. Critics argue that such films distract voters from pressing governance issues such as unemployment, inflation, and healthcare by diverting attention to emotionally charged communal conflicts.

Singhvi’s concerns stem from the fact that highly sensitive movies based on real-life tragedies have the power to harden identities and exacerbate social divisions. Political parties may weaponize such narratives to consolidate vote banks or sway undecided voters, creating a volatile environment that undermines democracy.

Potential Fallout on Communities

The timing of the film’s release is critical. With several Indian states heading to elections, Singhvi warns that inflammatory narratives could lead to communal clashes or unrest, Abhishek Singhvi especially in areas with existing fault lines. Protecting social harmony, therefore, must take precedence over cinematic profits or political agendas.

Reactions to Singhvi’s Appeal

The debate around Singhvi’s call to halt the movie’s release has drawn polarized reactions from various quarters:

Support for Singhvi’s Position

Several political leaders, activists, and commentators have backed Singhvi’s plea, Abhishek Singhvi emphasizing the importance of avoiding inflammatory content during sensitive times. They agree that artistic freedom must be exercised responsibly, and releasing such a movie near elections poses a direct threat to social stability.

Notable voices from academia and civil society have also argued that revisiting the 2020 Delhi riots in a cinematic format might overshadow ongoing justice efforts for the victims. Ensuring that survivors’ voices are not drowned out by one-sided narratives remains a priority.

Opposition to Censorship

On the other side, filmmakers, free speech advocates, and members of the artistic community have defended the right to create and distribute art without interference. They argue that censorship sets a dangerous precedent and suppresses creativity and free expression. Furthermore, Abhishek Singhvi they insist that audiences should be trusted to form their own opinions about sensitive topics, rather than have gatekeeping bodies decide what is “appropriate” for public consumption.

Filmmakers associated with the movie have claimed that their intent is purely artistic and not politically motivated. They have pointed out that their work is based on real events and aims to present a factual account without bias.              For the more information click on this link

Role of the Election Commission and Regulatory Bodies

The Election Commission now faces the challenge of balancing free expression with its mandate to ensure free and fair elections. Regulatory mechanisms such as the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) will also play a crucial role in determining whether the movie adheres to the necessary guidelines for public exhibition.

The EC must examine whether the film’s content violates the Model Code of Conduct or poses a direct threat to communal harmony. If necessary, the commission may choose to defer the movie’s release until after the elections to avoid any risk of political misuse.

Conclusion: Preserving Social Harmony Amid Creative Freedom

The controversy surrounding the proposed film on the 2020 Delhi riots highlights the delicate balance between creative freedom and the responsibility to maintain societal harmony. Abhishek Singhvi’s appeal to the EC underscores the need for caution in an era where divisive narratives often find fertile ground in political and social discourse.

While filmmakers must have the freedom to explore difficult subjects, Abhishek Singhvi their work must be tempered with a sense of responsibility, particularly when addressing issues as sensitive as communal violence. Regulatory bodies such as the EC and CBFC must tread carefully, ensuring that freedom of expression is upheld without compromising public order.

Ultimately, the larger goal must remain the preservation of India’s social fabric, where diverse communities coexist in peace and mutual respect. As the nation prepares for elections, Abhishek Singhvi the debate over the movie’s release serves as a reminder of the importance of unity over division, dialogue over provocation, and responsibility over sensationalism.                                                                                                                                                                                              ALSO READ:- Indonesian President Subianto Highlights Indian Influence on Indonesian Language and Genetics 2025