Elgar Parishad Case a long-awaited development, researcher Rona Wilson and activist Sudhir Dhawale, accused in the controversial Elgar Parishad-Maoist link case, walked out of prison on January 20, 2025, after spending nearly five years in custody. The Bombay High Court had granted bail to Wilson and Dhawale on January 8, noting that the trial under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), which began in 2018, was yet to start.
The decision comes as a significant relief for Wilson and Dhawale, who have consistently denied any wrongdoing and argued that they were falsely implicated in the case, which has drawn national and international scrutiny for its implications on freedom of expression, dissent, and human rights in India.
Background: The Elgar Parishad Case
The Elgar Parishad case dates back to December 31, 2017, when an event was organized in Pune to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Bhima Koregaon, a historic victory of Dalit forces against the Peshwas. The Elgar Parishad event, attended by prominent activists, academics, and artists, aimed to raise awareness about caste discrimination and other social justice issues.
However, violence broke out the next day during the Bhima Koregaon celebrations, and clashes led to the death of one person and injuries to many others. The Pune police claimed that speeches made during the Elgar Parishad event were provocative and had incited the violence.
In subsequent months, the investigation expanded, with authorities alleging links between some of the event organizers and banned Maoist groups. A case was filed under the stringent UAPA, and several activists, scholars, and lawyers—including Wilson and Dhawale—were arrested in 2018. The accused were charged with promoting anti-national activities and plotting to destabilize the government, but many have maintained that the case was politically motivated to suppress dissent. 
For the more information click on this link
Bail Granted After Prolonged Incarceration
On January 8, 2025, the Bombay High Court granted bail to Rona Wilson and Sudhir Dhawale, citing the prolonged delay in starting the trial and the lack of prima facie evidence linking them to acts of terrorism under the UAPA.
In its ruling, the court noted:
- Both Wilson and Dhawale had already spent nearly five years in custody, Elgar Parishad Case which constitutes a significant portion of the potential sentence they might face if convicted.
- The prosecution has yet to present concrete evidence that directly ties the accused to violent or terrorist activities.
- The trial in the case has not even commenced, highlighting severe delays in the legal process.
“Prolonged incarceration without trial infringes on an individual’s right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. Bail cannot be denied indefinitely, especially when the trial process has not advanced meaningfully,” observed the court.
Key Points in the Bail Order
- Delayed Trial:
The High Court pointed out the inordinate delay in the case. Despite five years having passed since the accused were arrested, the trial had not started, partly due to a backlog in courts and the complexity of cases involving UAPA provisions. - Questionable Evidence:
Wilson and Dhawale’s lawyers argued that electronic evidence presented by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) was questionable, citing an independent forensic report that alleged that Wilson’s devices had been hacked, and incriminating documents were planted. - Humanitarian Considerations:
The court emphasized that bail does not imply innocence or guilt, but lengthy pre-trial incarceration amounts to punishment without a fair trial.
Wilson and Dhawale’s Alleged Role in the Case
Rona Wilson
Rona Wilson, a researcher and public intellectual, has been accused by the NIA of being part of a larger Maoist conspiracy to destabilize the government. According to the agency, letters found on his computer mentioned plans to acquire arms, target political leaders, and spread Maoist propaganda.
However, Wilson’s defense team has maintained that the evidence is fabricated. A report by U.S.-based cybersecurity firm Arsenal Consulting claimed that his computer had been infected with malware and that the allegedly incriminating documents were planted. This finding has bolstered calls for Wilson’s release, with human rights groups arguing that the charges against him are baseless.
Sudhir Dhawale
Sudhir Dhawale, a Dalit activist, writer, and editor of the Marathi publication Vidrohi, has been vocal about caste-based oppression and inequality in India. Authorities have accused Dhawale of being a member of the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist) and helping organize the Elgar Parishad event as part of a Maoist strategy.
Dhawale’s supporters, however, argue that his activism for marginalized communities has been misconstrued as anti-national, and his writings have been selectively interpreted to build a case against him.
Walking Out of Prison: A Moment of Relief and Reflection
After completing the procedural requirements for their release, Wilson and Dhawale walked out of separate prisons in Mumbai and Taloja, respectively, to an outpouring of support from family, friends, Elgar Parishad Case and activists. The moment was filled with emotion as both men reiterated their innocence and expressed gratitude for the relentless advocacy by legal teams, human rights groups, and supporters who kept their plight in the spotlight.
“I lost five years of my life for a crime I didn’t commit. This case is not just about me but about silencing voices that speak for justice and equality,” Wilson said, Elgar Parishad Case addressing a crowd of supporters outside the prison.
Dhawale echoed similar sentiments, saying, “My release is not the end of the struggle. It’s a reminder that we need to continue the fight against systems of injustice and oppression.”
Their families, who had campaigned tirelessly for their release, spoke of the hardships faced during their imprisonment but celebrated their return home as a victory for justice.
Controversy Around the Elgar Parishad Case
The Elgar Parishad case has been widely criticized by human rights organizations, legal experts, and civil society for its alleged misuse of the UAPA to target intellectuals, Elgar Parishad Case activists, and critics of the government. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the UN have raised concerns about the lack of evidence and the arbitrary use of anti-terror laws.
Allegations of Fabricated Evidence
One of the major controversies surrounding the case is the claim that key pieces of evidence, particularly the documents purportedly recovered from Wilson’s computer, were planted using spyware. Multiple forensic analyses, including those by Arsenal Consulting, have strengthened the argument that the case is based on tampered evidence.
Implications of the Bail Order
The bail granted to Wilson and Dhawale could have broader implications for the other accused in the Elgar Parishad case. Several activists and academics, including Anand Teltumbde, Gautam Navlakha, Elgar Parishad Case and Hany Babu, remain in custody under the same charges, awaiting similar relief.
Legal analysts believe that the High Court’s decision may set a precedent for other accused individuals to seek bail, especially if the trial continues to be delayed.
Prominent lawyer Prashant Bhushan, who has been advocating for judicial reform, welcomed the court’s decision, stating:
“This case highlights the systemic flaws in India’s judicial process, particularly in handling UAPA cases. Prolonged pre-trial incarceration without evidence is a violation of basic human rights.”
Criticism of Judicial Delays in UAPA Cases
The Elgar Parishad case has reignited the debate on the misuse of draconian laws like the UAPA and the judicial system’s inability to ensure timely justice. Under the UAPA, obtaining bail is an arduous task, as the burden of proof lies heavily on the accused to demonstrate their innocence.
Civil liberties lawyer Vrinda Grover has repeatedly criticized the law for creating a system where individuals can be incarcerated for years without trial.
“UAPA cases are marked by delays, poor evidence, and political motivations. When courts fail to uphold constitutional protections, the right to a fair trial becomes meaningless,” she said. 
For the more information click on this link
Voices of Support
Numerous activists and organizations have expressed solidarity with Wilson and Dhawale, hailing their release as a victory for free speech and dissent in India. Public intellectual Noam Chomsky, who had previously signed a petition for Wilson’s release, called it a “positive step,” urging the government to drop the charges against all accused.
Writer Arundhati Roy, a long-time critic of state actions in the case, said, “Elgar Parishad Case These men are not criminals—they are India’s conscience keepers. Their release shows that truth still has a chance in our judicial system.”
Future Steps for Wilson and Dhawale
While their release is being celebrated, Elgar Parishad Case both Wilson and Dhawale’s legal battles are far from over. The case against them continues, with hearings and trials expected in the coming months. Both men have expressed their intent to fight the charges and expose what they call a politically motivated conspiracy.
Wilson, who was a part of several civil liberties organizations, has expressed his intent to resume his work as a researcher and activist. Dhawale, on the other hand, Elgar Parishad Case has vowed to continue his fight for Dalit rights and social justice.
Conclusion: A Step Toward Justice
The release of Rona Wilson and Sudhir Dhawale marks a significant moment in the Elgar Parishad case, bringing attention to critical issues of judicial delays, misuse of anti-terror laws, and the suppression of dissent in democratic societies. While their freedom is a step toward justice, Elgar Parishad Case it also underscores the challenges faced by activists and intellectuals in exercising their rights to free speech and advocacy.
As the case continues to unfold, it raises fundamental questions about India’s legal system and the fine balance between national security and the protection of individual freedoms. For now, the return of Wilson and Dhawale to their families is a reminder of the resilience of those who fight for justice, even in the face of systemic oppression. ALSO READ:- Three Militants Arrested in Manipur; Arms and Ammunition Recovered in Major Crackdown 2025