Trinamool Claims 40 SIR a fresh political storm has erupted in West Bengal after the Trinamool Congress (TMC) alleged that as many as 40 deaths occurred in the State due to complications linked with the SIR (Special Identification Registry) process, a centralised biometric verification programme rolled out recently by the Election Commission of India (ECI). The party has accused Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) of gross negligence and criminal insensitivity, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR stating that the “CEC has blood on his hands” for pushing forward what they call a “broken and dangerous system.”
The allegations have intensified an already fragile political climate in the State, raising questions about bureaucratic accountability, the safety of biometric systems, and the ethical limits of electoral administration. As political tensions mount, the controversy appears far from over.
This 2000-word detailed report examines the TMC’s allegations, the background of the SIR initiative, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR the Election Commission’s response, reactions from opposition parties, and the larger implications for West Bengal.
1. Background: What Is the SIR (Special Identification Registry)?
The Special Identification Registry, or SIR, is a biometric-based verification programme launched to strengthen the voter registration system. The initiative requires citizens to:
-
Update biometric data
-
Verify Aadhaar-voter card linkage
-
Provide proof of residence
-
Undergo physical verification if needed
The Election Commission argued that the SIR programme would prevent bogus voting, eliminate duplicate voter IDs, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR and streamline electoral rolls nationwide.
However, critics have raised concerns regarding:
-
Data safety
-
Technical glitches
-
Mismanagement in field operations
-
Overbearing pressure during verification
-
Errors in deletion or deactivation of voter IDs
In West Bengal, where political sensitivities are high, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR any procedural misstep can quickly escalate into a controversy — and this is exactly what has happened. 
watch video for more info
2. TMC’s Allegations: ‘Deaths Due to Stress, Negligence, and Forced Verification’
The Trinamool Congress has made a serious and politically explosive claim:
At least 40 individuals have allegedly died due to stress, medical complications, and procedural pressure caused by SIR verification drives.
According to TMC leaders:
-
Several elderly citizens collapsed while standing in long queues.
-
Physically disabled individuals were allegedly forced to appear for biometric verification despite clear exemptions.
-
Some citizens died shortly after being informed that their electoral status might be suspended due to mismatches in SIR data.
-
Field-level officers reportedly refused home-verification even for bedridden senior citizens.
TMC General Secretary Abhishek Banerjee claimed that the CEC “deliberately carried out the programme with zero care for public safety, causing avoidable deaths.”
The TMC has accused the Election Commission of:
-
Ignoring warning signals from the ground
-
Failing to deploy adequate resources
-
Pushing unrealistic deadlines
-
Using an “inhumane, one-size-fits-all model”
The party insists that the data verification process should have been voluntary and hybrid, not mandatory and physically taxing.
3. The ‘Blood on His Hands’ Statement: A Political Flashpoint
In one of the strongest statements made in recent political memory, TMC leaders said the CEC now has “blood on his hands”. The party claims that:
-
The SIR drive was implemented without assessing risks
-
Citizens were harassed unnecessarily
-
Repeated complaints to the EC were ignored
-
The CEC remained “insensitive and authoritarian”
This phrase has become a flashpoint for national political debate, sparking outrage, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR counterattacks, and demands for judicial intervention.
4. Family Testimonies: Stories Behind the Statistics
TMC has released testimonies and affidavits from families of deceased individuals. These include heart-wrenching narratives:
Case 1: The Elderly Pensioner
A 76-year-old man from East Midnapore reportedly died of a heart attack after standing in a verification queue for over three hours. His family alleges that he asked for permission for home verification but was denied.
Case 2: A Woman in North Bengal
A 62-year-old woman with chronic respiratory disease collapsed while waiting outside a verification camp.
Case 3: A Disabled Citizen
A man with 90% physical disability from Howrah was allegedly told that failure to appear physically would lead to suspension of his voter ID. He later suffered a stroke, according to his family. 
watch video for more info
Case 4: A Daily Wage Worker
A migrant labourer from Murshidabad reportedly fainted during the verification process and died in a local hospital.
TMC claims these stories represent only a fraction of the total distress caused by the “hasty and callous execution of SIR.”
5. Election Commission’s Response: ‘Baseless, Politically Motivated’
The Election Commission has firmly rejected the allegations.
In an official statement, the ECI said:
-
No evidence has been provided to establish a causal link between SIR and the alleged deaths.
-
Verification procedures included provisions for home visits.
-
Adequate health and queue-management measures were recommended to district officials.
-
The programme was necessary to ensure electoral integrity.
The Commission accused the TMC of “manufacturing panic” and “fear-mongering for political gain.”
6. Opposition Parties React: A Polarised Landscape
While the TMC stands firmly against the Election Commission, other parties have responded based on their political positioning:
BJP’s Reaction
The BJP has dismissed the TMC’s allegations as “fabricated drama.”
The party argues that:
-
TMC is attempting to divert attention from allegations of irregularities in local governance.
-
The SIR programme is a national reform, not a state issue.
BJP leaders insist that the verification process is smooth everywhere except in West Bengal due to “TMC-created chaos.”
Left Parties’ Reaction
The CPI(M) and Left parties have criticised the ECI for “poor planning” and “bureaucratic rigidity.”
They have demanded:
-
Suspension of ground-level verification
-
Medical support at verification centres
-
A review of the SIR protocol
However, the Left parties have not endorsed the TMC’s claim of 40 deaths without independent inquiry.
Congress
The Congress demanded a judicial probe to verify both administrative lapses and political claims.
7. Administrative Challenges and Ground Reports
Several independent ground reports suggest that the SIR programme may have faced serious logistical failures in West Bengal:
a. Overcrowded Verification Camps
Many centres were reportedly understaffed and overwhelmed with queues spanning hundreds of people.
b. Lack of Home Verification
Despite official provisions, many bedridden and elderly citizens claim they were denied home visits.
c. Technical Glitches
Biometric mismatch, fingerprint errors, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR and server downtime caused stress and delays.
d. Poor Communication
Citizens were unclear about requirements, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR leading to confusion and panic.
While these issues do not automatically confirm TMC’s claim of deaths,Trinamool Claims 40 SIR they do highlight significant mismanagement. 
watch video for more info
8. Experts Weigh In: Is the SIR Programme Unsafe?
Technology and governance experts have expressed concerns:
-
Biometric systems can cause exclusion if not implemented carefully.
-
Physical verification should be discretionary, not mandatory.
-
Elderly populations suffer the most in such programmes.
-
Digital alternatives must be provided to reduce physical strain.
Former IAS officials have stated that large-scale verification drives need:
-
Proper medical backup
-
Reasonable deadlines
-
Trained field staff
-
Modes adapted to local conditions
Some experts have called for temporary suspension of SIR until a full audit is conducted.
9. Impact on Bengal’s Political Climate
The controversy has significantly escalated tensions in West Bengal, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR a state already known for contentious politics.
a. Trust Deficit with Central Agencies
TMC argues that central institutions often act with bias against opposition-led states.
The SIR controversy reinforces that narrative.
b. Fear Among Citizens
Reports indicate:
-
Elderly people fearing loss of voter ID
-
Confusion among rural populations
-
Anxiety spreading due to viral videos and social media claims
c. Administrative Burden
District magistrates and election officers are struggling to balance political pressure and procedural requirements.
10. Legal Paths Ahead: Demands for Probe and Accountability
Multiple groups — including TMC, NGOs, human rights lawyers — have demanded:
-
A High Court-monitored investigation into the alleged deaths
-
Suspension of SIR verification until safety protocols are reviewed
-
Compensation for affected families
-
Criminal accountability if negligence is proven
Public Interest Litigations (PILs) are expected to be filed in the Calcutta High Court.
11. Will This Affect Upcoming Elections?
Political analysts believe the SIR controversy could influence upcoming elections:
-
TMC might use the issue to highlight “central overreach.”
-
BJP may argue that TMC is obstructing electoral reforms.
-
Opposition unity may form around demands for administrative transparency.
The emotional weight of the alleged deaths could sway public opinion, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR especially among rural and elderly voters.
12. The Larger Debate: Efficiency vs. Humanity in Governance
The SIR issue raises a fundamental question:
How far should the government go in enforcing systems that are meant for efficiency but may burden vulnerable citizens?
Key debates include:
-
Should biometric verification be optional for senior citizens?
-
Should home-verification be compulsory for individuals with disabilities?
-
Should biometric drives be paused during extreme weather or health emergencies?
-
What compensation should be given when state actions cause accidental harm?
These questions highlight the need for a sensitive, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR citizen-centric approach.
13. Conclusion: A Controversy That May Shape Bengal’s Political Future
The Trinamool Congress’s claim of 40 SIR-related deaths in West Bengal marks a significant escalation in the political battle between the State Government and the Election Commission of India. Whether the numbers stand legal scrutiny remains to be seen, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR but the issue has already ignited debates about governance ethics, bureaucratic accountability, and voter rights.
As the TMC accuses the CEC of having “blood on his hands” and the ECI calls the allegations fabricated, Trinamool Claims 40 SIR the truth lies entangled in a politically charged environment.
What is clear is that:
-
The SIR programme has caused widespread distress.
-
The administration needs to re-evaluate its implementation strategy.
-
Vulnerable populations must be protected at all costs.
-
A transparent investigation is necessary to restore public faith.
Until then, the controversy over SIR will continue to dominate Bengal’s political discourse — with far-reaching implications for both governance and democracy in the state. ALSO READ:-PM Modi and Canada’s Carney Forge New Path: Unlocking Deeper Cooperation in Defence, Space & AI 2025